Complaint to Ofcom Regarding “The Great Global Warming Swindle”2. Complete Transcript and Rebuttal |
|
|
[Comment 43: The reference to “cars and planes” is misleading – they are not relevant here, because the early growth of CO2 emissions was due to burning of coal for heating, industrial activity and electricity generation. The narrator continues to misrepresent global warming theory (see also Comment 40, page 33): by claiming that industrial growth can be used to predict temperature change. His concerns would be justified if the theory actually did link industrial growth to instantaneous climate change. However, not only are industrial growth levels not directly linked to human greenhouse gas emission levels (see Comment 40, page 33), but in addition, greenhouse gas levels are not linked by the theory to instantaneous temperature changes. There are many factors affecting climate in addition to greenhouse gas levels (see Comment 55, page 50 and the 2001 IPCC report at: http://tinyurl.com/32zmpm). The cooling period post-WWII, and the subsequent warming, is consistent with greenhouse warming theory, and is reproduced in all recent climate models (see http://tinyurl.com/yskadk [IPCC]). The mild cooling period post-WWII (which was greatly exaggerated in the documentary’s graph, see Comment 42, page 35) has been shown to have been due to sulphate aerosol emissions. Once sulphate emissions were controlled as a consequence of air quality regulation in the 1970s, the warming impact of the greenhouse gases took over (see Realclimate: http://tinyurl.com/26sf9x). Furthermore, the suggestion that global temperatures should be rising and falling in immediate tandem with the emissions of greenhouse gas neglects the thermal lag in the climate system. This lag is driven largely by the oceans, which are so large that it takes centuries for them to warm up (see http://tinyurl.com/3avwtj [IPCC]). The film makers actually make reference to this “memory” of the oceans later on in the programme (see Carl Wunsch, page 49), but disregard it at this point in the film. This is again a clear misrepresentation by the film makers of the theory of greenhouse warming.] (In breach of the 2003 Communications Act Section 265, Ofcom 5.4, 5.5, 5.11, 5.12) |
[Bookmarks on this page:
Click the following link to go to that bookmark. You can then copy and paste
the bookmark’s url from your address bar, and send it to someone as a link
straight to that bookmark:
Comment 43: Misrepresentation of link between economic growth and global warming]
|
||
Final Revision |
Last updated: 11 Jun 2007 |