Complaint to Ofcom Regarding “The Great Global Warming Swindle”1. Complaint Summary |
|
|
A total of 25 breaches fell into this category, although we have grouped related breaches if no individual had been named; and for the purposes of this complaint we consider them to collectively constitute 9 serious breaches: see Appendix A.1.2, page 116 for details. |
|||||||||
1.6.4 |
Use of “Straw Man”, “Ad Hominem” and “Non-sequitur” Logical FallaciesIt is a serious matter if a film shown by a public service broadcaster, that claims to be a “documentary” on a complex scientific subject, resorts to using logical fallacies in an apparent attempt to mislead viewers. The most common logical fallacies used by the programme were Straw Man arguments (pretending that one’s opponents are taking an absurd position that they are not taking, and then attacking that absurd position); ad hominem attacks (replying to an argument by attacking the person making the argument, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument); and non-sequiturs (stating conclusions that do not logically follow from what has gone before, for example “because human emissions were not responsible for pre-industrial climate change, it is therefore impossible that they could be strongly influencing climate change now”). For example, see Comment 23, page 23; Comment 79, page 70; Comment 80, page 71; Comment 35, page 27. |
[Bookmarks on this page:
Click the following link to go to that bookmark. You can then copy and paste
the bookmark’s url from your address bar, and send it to someone as a link
straight to that bookmark:
Section 1.6.4]
|
||
Final Revision |
Last updated: 11 Jun 2007 |