Complaint to Ofcom Regarding “The Great Global Warming Swindle”2. Complete Transcript and Rebuttal |
|
|
Most of the above is very basic, and very well-established and well-understood physics. While it is understandable that a layman should be unfamiliar with some of these concepts, it is quite inconceivable that Ball Clark and Singer, as well as the narrator, were unfamiliar with them. Thus they were clearly not simply expressing an ill-informed opinion, or making an error – they were apparently intentionally and knowingly setting out to mislead the public.] (In breach of the 2003 Communications Act Section 265, Ofcom 5.5, 5.7, 5.11, 5.12) |
|||||||||||
2.6 |
“Humans Don’t Produce Much Carbon Dioxide”
[Comment 51: Humans are not “made of carbon dioxide” (Nigel Calder is confusing carbon dioxide with carbon). Besides, his statement is a non-sequitur: the statement could be more accurately applied to water: does the fact that humans are made of water imply that flooding is not a problem?] (In breach of Ofcom 5.7)
[Comment 52: Firstly, if volcanoes were a dominant source of CO2, we should see spikes in the long-term CO2 concentration record whenever volcanoes erupt – yet we do not. See the figure here: http://tinyurl.com/2n7nfz. An article by the US Geological Survey (http://tinyurl.com/3hasm) highlights that humans contribute 150 times more CO2 into the atmosphere than volcanoes every year, which is consistent with a British Geological Survey citation (http://tinyurl.com/2pelm4) that the annual emissions of CO2 by volcanoes is less than 1% that of humans. Continued … |
[Bookmarks on this page:
Click any of the following links to go to that bookmark. You can then copy and paste
the bookmark’s url from your address bar, and send it to someone as a link
straight to that bookmark:
Section 2.6 /
Comment 51: Non- sequitur and claim that humans are made of carbon dioxide /
Comment 52: Claim that volcanoes are a dominant source of CO2]
|
||
Final Revision |
Last updated: 11 Jun 2007 |